[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153846619.8932.36.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:56:58 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: David Lang <dlang@...italinsight.com>
Cc: Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@...skialf.net>,
Arnaud Patard <apatard@...driva.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: automated test? (was Re: Linux 2.6.17.7)
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 09:47 -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 10:55, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> >> Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> writes:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.17.7 kernel.
> >>
> >> Sorry, but doesn't compile if DVB_BUDGET_AV is set :(
> >>
> >>> Andrew de Quincey:
> >>> v4l/dvb: Fix budget-av frontend detection
> >
> >
> > In fact it is just this patch causing the problem:
> <SNIP>
> > Sorry, I had so much work going on in that area I must have diffed the wrong
> > kernel when I created this patch. :(
>
> is it reasonable to have an aotomated test figure out what config options are
> relavent to a patch (or patchset) and test compile all the combinations to catch
> this sort of mistake?
well you can do such a thing withing statistical bounds; however... if
the patch already is in -git (as is -stable policy normally).. it should
have been found there already...
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists