linux-kernel - Re: utrace vs. ptrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:49:02 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>, arjan@...radead.org,
	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: utrace vs. ptrace

On Iau, 2006-07-13 at 12:05 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Doing core-dumping in user space would be insane. It doesn't give _any_ 
> advantages, only disadvantages.

It has a number of very real advantages in certain circumstances and the
only interface the kernel needs to provide is the debugger interface and
something to "kick" the debugger and reparent to it, or for that matter
it might even be viable just to pass the helper the fd of an anonymous
file holding the dump.

Taking out the kernel core dump support would be insane.

We get customers who like to collect/process/do clever stuff with core
dumps and failure cases. We also get people who want to dump a core that
excludes the 14GB shared mmap of the database file as another example
where it helps.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/