linux-kernel - Re: Bug with USB proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060725193140.GK2037@1wt.eu>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:31:40 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
Cc:	Benjamin Cherian <benjamin.cherian.kernel@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel

Hi Pete,

On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:07:32PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:43:59 -0700, Benjamin Cherian <benjamin.cherian.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Although I am starting to think about creating a custom locking
> > > scheme in devio.c after all. It seems like less work.
> 
> > What's your timeframe for this? Good luck with it.
> 
> OK, now I hate my life, I hate you, I hate Stuart, but most of all
> I hate the anonymous Japanese who wrote the microcode for TEAC CD-210PU.
> Anyway, please test the attached patch. Does it do what you want?

I'm very glad that you're still maintaining 2.4 code so much actively. Do
you think of any possible side effects that non-TEAC users might encounter ?
If you feel more comfortable after some particular corner-case tests on other
hardware, please ask.

> -- Pete

Cheers,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/