| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20060725205958.GB4807@merlin.emma.line.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:59:58 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de> To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Al Boldi wrote: > Rejection of content should be based on technical merits only, and no process It pretty much looks like the original rejection (not to forget that) after review was based on technical reasons, then the messenger was hurt, and that's where the fussing started and it thus became a social issue. -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists