[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44C68AA8.6080702@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:18:32 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: jg@...top.org
CC: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
jg@...edesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC: Add mmap method to rtc character driver
Jim Gettys wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:04 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> That's why I'm suggesting adding a cheap, possibly low-res, gettimeofday
>> virtual system call in case there is no way for the kernel to provide
>> userspace with a cheap full-resolution gettimeofday. Obviously, if a
>> high-quality gettimeofday is available, then they can be linked together
>> by the kernel.
>
> Low res is fine: X Timestamps are 1 millisecond values, and wrap after a
> few hundred days. What we do care about is monotonically increasing
> values (until it wraps). On machines of the past, this was very
> convenient; we'd just store a 32 bit value for clients to read, and not
> bother with locking. I guess these days, you'd at least have to protect
> the store with a memory barrier, maybe....
>
> It was amusing years ago to find toolkit bugs after applications had
> been up for that long (32 bits of milliseconds)... Yes, there are
> applications and machines that stay up that long, really there are....
>
Do you need 1 ms resolution, or is 10 ms good enough?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists