linux-kernel - Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200607252144.k6PLinkh028359@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:44:49 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Nikita Danilov <nikita@...sterfs.com>, Steve Lord <lord@....org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:30:23 EDT, Theodore Tso said:
> both have to do a line-by-line review, and with a promise of on-disk
> and ABI compatibility *forever* ---- that we do more commits in a week

"forever"? Man, that's hard-core. Is that *really* the guideline, or is
it some "might as well be forever in this industry" rule like "5 years"?




Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped