| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20060725230740.GF23966@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:07:41 -0500 From: Jon Mason <jdmason@...ibm.com> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> Cc: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, discuss@...-64.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 7] x86-64: Calgary IOMMU updates On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:25:56AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tuesday 25 July 2006 18:56, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > Hi Andi, > > > > This patchset contains a few Calgary bug fixes (mostly in the error > > handling) and a few harmless associated cleanups (e.g., rearranging > > structures for better alignment). It would be good to get these, > > especially the bug fixes, into 2.6.18. > > How do these patches relate to the two earlier patches that Jon sent? These patches are ontop of the patches I sent (and which Muli resent a few days afterward). Those patches fix a major problem and need to make it into 2.6.18. > > 2.6.18 is closed for anything but bug fixes for serious bugs. This is mostly error path bugs and clean-up/code re-org (to save memory and make things more cache friendly). The changes are mostly minor. If you are uncomfortable with applying them, we can separate patches 3, 4, and 5 (which are the bug fixes) from the rest and send those to you. Is that more acceptable? Thanks, Jon > -Andi > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists