linux-kernel - Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44C5A629.8090602@garzik.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:03:37 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org

Al Boldi wrote:
> Rejection of content should be based on technical merits only, and no process 
> guidelines should stay in the way of its preliminary acceptance.  Otherwise, 
> we would be asking for a return to a bureaucratic system that inhibits 
> innovation, which I'm sure is not the intention of anybody, I hope.

The most perfect filesystem in the world would be rejected, if it lacked 
a maintainer and/or is otherwise undebuggable or unmaintainable.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/