[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0607261303270.17613@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:05:43 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...Helsinki.FI>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Since ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN didn't work on s390 I tried ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
> instead, just to find out that it didn't work too.
> In case of CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB kmem_cache_create() creates caches with an
> alignment lesser than ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN, which it shouldn't according to
> this comment in mm/slab.c :
[snip]
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/slab.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slab.c 2006-07-26 09:55:54.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/slab.c 2006-07-26 09:57:07.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2103,6 +2103,9 @@
> if (ralign > BYTES_PER_WORD)
> flags &= ~(SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER);
> }
> + if (BYTES_PER_WORD < ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN)
> + flags &= ~(SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_STORE_USER);
> +
> /* 3) caller mandated alignment: disables debug if necessary */
> if (ralign < align) {
> ralign = align;
This is similar to my patch and should be enough to fix the problem. The
first patch seems bogus and I don't really understand why you would need
it.
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists