[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1153876807.7559.39.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:20:06 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: hch <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ed Lin <ed.lin@...mise.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"James.Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...l.org>, promise_linux <promise_linux@...mise.com>,
jeff <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Promise 'stex' driver
On Maw, 2006-07-25 at 10:26 +0100, hch wrote:
> We have more than enough precedence for poking the bridge that comes as
> part of addon cards. As long as the code makes sure it never pokes a bridge
> of the same type that is not on the card (and I don't have the code in front
> of me right now to check whether it's true) we can keep this code. Please
> make sure to add a big comment that explains what is going on in detail
> and why it's okay in this special case.
It does check the basic layout so looks robust. Checking subvendor stuff
is normally a good back-up. We do similar plumbing work in the Promise
IDE and I2O code to handle the old SuperTrak/SX6000 cards and it work
solidly.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists