lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607260426450.3744@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Hi Heiko,
> 
> On 7/22/06, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> > Sorry, I should have mentioned it: on s390 (32 bit) we set
> > #define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN 8.
> > This is needed since our common I/O layer allocates data structures that
> > need
> > to have an eight byte alignment. Now, if I turn on DEBUG_SLAB, nothing works
> > anymore, simply because the slab cache code ignores ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
> > and
> > uses an BYTES_PER_WORD alignment instead, which it shouldn't:
> 
> This is the bit I missed, sorry. I thought that the s390 hardware
> mandates 8 byte alignment, but it really doesn't. So you're absolutely
> right, you don't need to set ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN and the alignment
> calculation in slab is indeed broken for both, architecture and caller
> mandated alignments.

Well that is a bit far reaching. What is broken is that SLAB_RED_ZONE and
SLAB_STORE_USER ignore any given alignment. If you want to fix that then 
you need to modify how both debugging methods work.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ