lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:46:20 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Multi-threaded device probing

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:42:36AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > I still think we need a method of renaming block devices, but haven't
> > > looked into it in enough detail yet.
> > 
> > That could get "interesting"...
> > 
> > But now that we all are using /dev/disk/ and it has persistant device
> > names for block devices, I really don't think it's that big of a deal.
> 
> Actually, that's exactly why it's a big deal.  The kernel spits out
> messages like:
> 
>                 printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Mode Sense: %02x %02x %02x %02x\n",
>                        diskname, buffer[0], buffer[1], buffer[2], buffer[3]);
> 
> where diskname is something like sda.  Now the user has to figure out
> what sda means in terms of /dev/disk/ and in terms of scsi h:c:t:l and
> in terms of which sticky label is on which drive.  If we let userspace
> change the gendev's disk_name, that printk can be meaningful to the user
> in at least one of those senses.

No, this comes up all the time.  Userspace has at least 3 different
mappings to /dev/sda in /dev/disk right now.  Which one do you want the
kernel to use?:

	$ tree /dev/disk/ | grep sda1
	|   |-- scsi-SATA_Maxtor_7L250S0_L59FRPQH_L59FRPQH-part1 -> ../../sda1
	|   |-- boot -> ../../sda1
	    `-- 9c0ef40c-6de9-46f6-ac79-32296c667cf1 -> ../../sda1

Userspace should be doing the reverse mapping if it wants to, the kernel
should not care about this at all.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ