[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CFF307C98FEABE47A452B27C06B85BB6011250B3@hdsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:22:52 -0400
From: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>
Cc: "Marco Berizzi" <pupilla@...mail.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: smp + acpi
>> CONFIG_ACPI=y is necessary to parse the ACPI tables
>> and discover HT siblings. Except for the rare BIOS
>> that gives the option to enumerate HT via MPS
>> (thus breaking some versions of Windows),
>> enabling ACPI is the only way to enable HT.
>>
>> Yes, in the distant past, CONFIG_ACPI=n did not remove
>> all ACPI code from your kernel, and that was a bug.
>
>Ok thanks for the confirmation.
>
>However the proposed change would be still wrong because
>SMP can be without HT.
What proposed change?
I expect that the problem at hand is that CONFIG_SMP=y
is fine, but with CONFIG_ACPI=n, that isn't going to
find the HT threads on an HT system.
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists