[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44C7AF31.9000507@colorfullife.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:06:41 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...Helsinki.FI>
CC: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>
>
>>We only specify ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, since that aligns only the kmalloc
>>caches, but it doesn't disable debugging on other caches that are created
>>via kmem_cache_create() where an alignment of e.g. 0 is specified.
>>
>>The point of the first patch is: why should the slab cache be allowed to chose
>>an aligment that is less than what the caller specified? This does very likely
>>break things.
>>
>>
>
>Ah, yes, you are absolutely right. We need to respect caller mandated
>alignment too. How about this?
>
>
>
Good catch - I obviously never tested the code for an HWCACHE_ALIGN cache...
> Pekka
>
>[PATCH] slab: respect architecture and caller mandated alignment
>
>Ensure cache alignment is always at minimum what the architecture or
>caller mandates even if slab debugging is enabled.
>
>Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
>
>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists