[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607261126030.6690@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> There are two different types of alignment:
> - SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN: it's a recommendation, it's regularly ignored.
> - the align parameter, or ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN: It's mandatory. For example the
> pgd structures must be 4 kB aligned, it's required by the hardware. And I
> think there was (is?) a structure where ptr & ~(size-1) was used to find the
> start of the structure.
I agree with the above if there is an issue there then lets fix it.
> Thus the patch is correct, it's a bug in the slab allocator. If HWCACHE_ALIGN
> is set, then the allocator ignores align or ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN.
But then Heiko does not want to set ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN at all. This is not
the issue we are discussing. In the DEBUG case he wants
ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to be enforced even if ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN is not
set.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists