linux-kernel - RE: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A84303218F09@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:34:14 -0500
From:	"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>
cc:	"Gulam, Nagib" <nagib.gulam@....com>, discuss@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: RE: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to
 change pstate at same time

> > AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 838 stepping 01 CPU 3: Syncing 
> TSC to CPU 0.
> > CPU 3: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -109 cycles, 
> maxerr 1024
> 
> Hmm, indeed  - i would have expected higher max errors too.
> It should have worked in theory. No explanation currently.

THat's unfortunate.
 
> > cycles)
> > powernow-k8:    0 : fid 0xe (2200 MHz), vid 0x6
> > powernow-k8:    1 : fid 0xc (2000 MHz), vid 0x8
> > powernow-k8:    2 : fid 0xa (1800 MHz), vid 0xa
> > powernow-k8:    3 : fid 0x2 (1000 MHz), vid 0x12
> > 
> > Is there a better test we can be using?
> 
> I don't know of any. Ok I guess it would be possible to write 
> something in user space, but it would likely look similar to 
> the algorithm the kernel uses.

I ran the following simple test on the 4P system with TSC
gtod for a week:
while true; do date; sleep 3600; done
the first entry went in at July 13 15:39:48, the last entry
at  July 25 15:39:50.  A drift of 2 seconds over 12 days is 
within specification, I believe.

In contrast, the same machine running with TSC and standard
PN! sees massive drift, upwards of an hour, within an hour.

If the TSCnow! patch reduces measured drift down to a second 
a week, would you consider that acceptable?

-Mark Langsdorf
AMD, Inc.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/