[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607251702560.464@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: inactive-clean list
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Well, I read the whole thing before I replied and I could not figure this
> > one out. Maybe I am too dumb to understand. Could you please explain
> > yourself in more detail
>
> Page state transitions can be very expensive in a virtualized
> environment, so it would be good if we had fewer transitions.
So the hypervisor indeed tracks each individual page state? Note that I do
not propose to change the page state but a counter for page states. I am
bit confused about how not touching a page can cause page state
transitions. But then I do not know much about hypervisors. What magic is
going on in the background that could enable the hypervisor to track
counter increments?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists