[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060726062647.GA8711@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:26:47 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openib-general@...nib.org
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: don't pull in includes when lockdep disabled
Ingo, does the following look good to you?
Do not pull in various includes through lockdep.h if lockdep is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...lanox.co.il>
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 316e0fb..39d50c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
#ifndef __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
#define __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-
/*
* Lock-class usage-state bits:
*/
--
MST
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists