linux-kernel - Re: lockdep: results on ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060727142331.GA26040@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:23:31 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan Van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: lockdep: results on ARM


* Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> The best fix I've come up with which seems to work is:

> +#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
> +	p->hardirqs_enabled = 1;
> +#else
>  	p->hardirqs_enabled = 0;
> +#endif

yeah - that's the right solution - a new task's "soft" hardirq state 
should be initialized to the real irq-mode it starts up under.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/