linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 1/2] CPU hotplug compatible alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20060727091843.c2192bbc.pj@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:18:43 -0700
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Martin Peschke <mp3@...ibm.com>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] CPU hotplug compatible alloc_percpu

Martin wrote:
> +static inline int percpu_populate_mask(void *__pdata, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
> +				       int cpu)
> +{

It seems odd to me that this signature of percpu_populate_mask()
has its last argument 'int cpu' for the !CONFIG_SMP case, but
the SMP signatures have 'cpumask_t mask'.

Shouldn't this function signature be the same for all CONFIG's?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/