[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a36005b50607271013o3c03238fq4ecea87dcd3c1e90@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:13:13 -0700
From: "Ulrich Drepper" <drepper@...il.com>
To: "Pekka J Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...l.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
tytso@....edu, tigran@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
On 7/27/06, Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Sure. Though I wonder if sys_frevoke is enough for us and we can drop
> sys_revoke completely.
No, you want sys_revoke/sys_revokeat. Simplest case: /dev/rst0 vs
/dev/nrst0. You don't want the open rewind the drive.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists