[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1154024943.29920.3.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:29:03 -0700
From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc: Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation.
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 11:14 -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> > Suparna mentioned at Ulrich wants us to concentrate on kernel-side
> > support, so that he can look at glibc side of things (along with
> > other work he is already doing). So, if we can get an agreement on
> > what kind of kernel support is needed - we can focus our efforts on
> > kernel side first and leave glibc enablement to capable hands of Uli
> > :)
>
> Yeah, and the existing patches still need some cleanup. Badari, did you
> still want me to look into that?
>
> We need someone to claim ultimate responsibility for getting these
> patches suitable for merging :). I'm happy to do that if Suparna isn't
> already on it.
Zach,
Thanks for volunteering !! Sebastien & I should be able to help you.
Before we spend too much time cleaning up and merging into mainline -
I would like an agreement that what we add is good enough for glibc
POSIX AIO. I hate to waste everyone's time and add complexity to the
kernel - if glibc side is not going to happen :(
Thanks,
Badari
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists