linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060727021047.GG28284@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:10:47 -0400
From:	Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org, jeff@...zik.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
	vlobanov@...akeasy.net, jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de,
	getshorty_@...mail.com, pwil3058@...pond.net.au, mb@...sch.de,
	penberg@...helsinki.fi, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de,
	larsbj@...lik.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 06:06:22PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Richard wrote:
> > * removed the #undef false/true and #define false/true
> 
> Good - thanks.
> 
> +enum {
> +	false	= 0,
> +	true	= 1
> +};

You probably have said it before, but why do we need this?

Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

-- 
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
that.
		- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/