[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060727191247.GA29166@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:12:47 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, jack@...e.cz, 20@...ingley.org,
marcel@...tmann.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sct@...hat.com,
adilger@...sterfs.com
Subject: Re: Bad ext3/nfs DoS bug
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:32:43PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Neil Brown wrote:
> >On Wednesday July 26, sandeen@...deen.net wrote:
>
> >>Hm, with this, ext3.ko has a new dependency on exportfs.ko. Is that
> >>desirable/acceptable?
> >
> >Drat, you're right.
> >No, I don't think that is what we want.
> >I'll do it differently in a day or so.
>
> Would moving export_iget into fs/inode.c & exporting it from there be a
> reasonable way to go? At least ext2 & ext3 both have this need (prevent
> nfs access to special inodes) so putting the bulk of what they need for
> get_dentry (i.e. export_iget) somewhere common seems like a decent
> option to me.
Nope. The right fix is to not make ext2/3 rely on export_iget at all. Please
implement the proper export_operations instead, similar to e.g. xfs.
export_iget is a horrible layering violation that needs to go away long-term,
not move into core code.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists