linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:13:59 -0700
From:	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>
To:	ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	Shorty Porty <getshorty_@...mail.com>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>, larsbj@...lik.net,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 21:55 +0200, ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se wrote:
> Citerar Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>:
> 
> > If _Bool does end up in the user-kernel ABI, be advised that validating
> > them will be tricky ("b == true || b == false" or "!!b" won't work), and
> 
> Why would !!b not work?
> I don't think it should end up in the ABI (at least, not yet). Just asking
> because I'm curious. :)
> 

The compiler knows that "b = !!b;" is a no-op.

-- 
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/