linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060727044004.GJ28284@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:40:04 -0400
From:	Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
To:	ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se
Cc:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...l.org, jeff@...zik.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
	vlobanov@...akeasy.net, jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de,
	getshorty_@...mail.com, pwil3058@...pond.net.au, mb@...sch.de,
	penberg@...helsinki.fi, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de,
	larsbj@...lik.net
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:51:10AM +0200, ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se wrote:
...
> Hope it make some sense.

Fair enough.

> PS
> If I got you wrong and you meant why it can't be defined where it is used, I
> refere you to Andrew's mail "[patch 1/1] consolidate TRUE and FALSE", where a
> redefinition occured (of TRUE/FALSE).

You first guess was right.

Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

-- 
NT is to UNIX what a doughnut is to a particle accelerator.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/