[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200607270745.42622.arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:45:41 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...ibm.com>
To: Petr Vandrovec <petr@...drovec.name>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ncpfs: move ioctl32 code to fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
On Thursday 27 July 2006 05:35, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Yes, tomorrow (on amd64).
No need to hurry, I was sitting on my patch for more than a year now ;-)
> Although I understand that this code is correct, what about removing this second
> #ifdef ? gcc should realize it anyway that without CONFIG_COMPAT defined cmd
> must be equal to NCP_IOC_GETPRIVATEDATA, and having empty "else" variant is IMHO
> just asking for troubles.
That was what I did first, but unfortunately we don't define compat_caddr_t when
CONFIG_COMPAT is disabled, so it would reference an invalid data structure.
> Or what about
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> if (cmd == NCP_IOC_GETPRIVATEDATA_32) {
> struct ...
> } else
> #endif
> if (copy_to_user(argp, &user, sizeof(user)))
> return -EFAULT;
Yes, that should be clearer than my approach.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists