linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Some const for linux/time.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0607281543020.15192@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:46:22 +0200 (MEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	Josef Sipek <jsipek@....cs.sunysb.edu>
cc:	akpm@...l.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some const for linux/time.h

>>  
>> -static inline int timespec_equal(struct timespec *a, struct timespec *b)
>> +static inline int timespec_equal(const struct timespec *a,
>> + const struct timespec *b)
>
>As per CodingStyle, the second line should be "placed substantially to the
>right."

Is one space to few "substance"? How about ... MORE substance

diff --fast -Ndpru linux-2.6.17.7~/include/linux/time.h linux-2.6.17.7+/include/linux/time.h
--- linux-2.6.17.7~/include/linux/time.h	2006-06-06 02:57:02.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.17.7+/include/linux/time.h	2006-07-27 22:35:53.308571000 +0200
@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ struct timezone {
 #define NSEC_PER_SEC		1000000000L
 #define NSEC_PER_USEC		1000L
 
-static inline int timespec_equal(struct timespec *a, struct timespec *b)
+static inline int timespec_equal(const struct timespec *a,
+							const struct timespec *b)
 {
 	return (a->tv_sec == b->tv_sec) && (a->tv_nsec == b->tv_nsec);
 }
@@ -43,7 +44,8 @@ static inline int timespec_equal(struct 
  * lhs == rhs: return 0
  * lhs > rhs:  return >0
  */
-static inline int timespec_compare(struct timespec *lhs, struct timespec *rhs)
+static inline int timespec_compare(const struct timespec *lhs,
+						const struct timespec *rhs)
 {
 	if (lhs->tv_sec < rhs->tv_sec)
 		return -1;
@@ -52,7 +54,8 @@ static inline int timespec_compare(struc
 	return lhs->tv_nsec - rhs->tv_nsec;
 }
 
-static inline int timeval_compare(struct timeval *lhs, struct timeval *rhs)
+static inline int timeval_compare(const struct timeval *lhs,
+						const struct timeval *rhs)
 {
 	if (lhs->tv_sec < rhs->tv_sec)
 		return -1;
#

SCNR. Don't take this one seriously. But the previous one.


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/