[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44CA31D2.70203@slaphack.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:48:34 -0500
From: David Masover <ninja@...phack.com>
To: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>
CC: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@...esys.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed
by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> It is then simple to follow that train of logic: why not make it easy
>> to replace the directory algorithm [and associated metadata]? or the
>> file data space management algorithms? or even the inode handling?
>> why not allow customers to replace a stock algorithm with an exotic,
>> site-specific one?
>
> IMVHO, such experiments should/must be done in userspace. And AFAICS, they
> can today.
inode handling? Really?
But what's wrong with people doing such experiments outside the kernel?
AFAICS, "exotic, site-specific one" is not something that would be
considered for inclusion.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists