linux-kernel - Re: Bug with USB proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200607281037.28328.benjamin.cherian.kernel@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:37:27 -0700
From:	Benjamin Cherian <benjamin.cherian.kernel@...il.com>
To:	Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Bug with USB proc_bulk in 2.4 kernel

Hi Pete,
Thanks for the reply.
> By the way, you didn't tell me if you tried to use alarm(2) across
> submitted URBs. This is the technique ADSL modem drivers use. They
> also have to have input and output streams running simultaneously.

I'm making a library to operate my device, and I don't want to use alarm, 
because the user might need to use alarm in his own applications.

Thanks again,
Ben

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/