[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1154118962.13509.185.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:36:02 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
a.zummo@...ertech.it, jg@...edesktop.org
Subject: Re: A better interface, perhaps: a timed signal flag
Ar Gwe, 2006-07-28 am 16:12 -0400, ysgrifennodd Steven Rostedt:
> what the kernel does with wake_up. That way you can sleep till another
> process/thread is done with what it was doing and wake up the other task
> when done, without the use of signals. Or is there something that
> already does this?
futex and sys5 semaphore both do this. The latter is very portable but a
bit less efficient.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists