[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44CA8B56.4000402@microgate.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:10:30 -0500
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 timer int 0 doesn't work
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I don't know what would have caused this. Was 2.6.18-rc1-mm2 OK?
I have not tried that combination.
> Patches which touch arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c are:
>
> x86_64-mm-i386-up-generic-arch.patch
> x86_64-mm-i386-io-apic-access.patch
> genirq-convert-the-i386-architecture-to-irq-chips.patch
> initial-generic-hypertransport-interrupt-support.patch
> genirq-i386-irq-remove-the-msi-assumption-that-irq-==-vector.patch
> genirq-i386-irq-move-msi-message-composition-into-io_apicc.patch
> genirq-i386-irq-dynamic-irq-support.patch
>
> The developers of those patches are cc'ed.
>
> A bisection search would be useful, if you have the time. I'd zero in on
> the x86_64 tree initially. Perhaps x86_64-mm-i386-io-apic-access.patch.
>
> Or it could be something else altogether.
The machine in question is at the office so I won't be able
to test that particular setup this weekend. I will test removing
the listed patches as time permits starting on Monday.
It happens every time so there is no problem in reproducing it.
I will also test 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 on my home machine which
is AMDx2 as well (but a different chipset/MB).
--
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists