[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200607291825.16308.ak@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:25:15 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: discuss@...-64.org, kmannth@...ibm.com
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lhms-devel <lhms-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
andrew <akpm@...l.org>, dave hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
kame <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, konrad <darnok@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [Patch] 2/5 in support of hot-add memory x86_64 create arch_find_node
On Saturday 29 July 2006 04:52, keith mannthey wrote:
> With the advent of the new ACPI hot-plug memory driver and mechanism
> is needed to deal with ACPI add memory events that do not contain the
> pxm (node) information. I do not believe that the add-event is required
> to contain this information so I create a arch_find_node generic layer
> used in the generic add_memory function.
>
> If add_memory is called with node < 0 arch_find_node is invoked to
> fine the correct node to add the memory. This created the generic
> construct of arch_find_node.
It would be cleaner to always call add_memory from architecture specific
code instead of such ugly hooks
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists