lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <44CBE26D.5090901@watson.ibm.com>
Date:	Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:34:21 -0400
From:	Shailabh Nagar <nagar@...son.ibm.com>
To:	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc2-mm1

Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 21:53 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> 
>>On 28/07/06, Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 01:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:17:44 +0200
>>>>"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Matt, can you look at this?
>>>>>
>>>>>My hunt file shows me, that this patches are causing oops.
>>>>>GOOD
>>>>>#
>>>>>#
>>>>>task-watchers-task-watchers.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-register-process-events-task-watcher.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-refactor-process-events.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-make-process-events-configurable-as.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-allow-task-watchers-to-block.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-register-audit-task-watcher.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-register-per-task-delay-accounting.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-register-profile-as-a-task-watcher.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-add-support-for-per-task-watchers.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-register-semundo-task-watcher.patch
>>>>>task-watchers-register-per-task-semundo-watcher.patch
>>>>>BAD
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for working that out.
>>>
>>>        I noticed the delay accounting functions in the stack trace. Perhaps
>>>task-watchers-register-per-task-delay-accounting.patch is causing the
>>>problem.
>>
>>Confirmed.
> 
> 
> Excellent, thanks for the rapid confirmation. I'll work with Shailabh
> and Balbir to fix this. In the meantime perhaps
> task-watchers-register-per-task-delay-accounting.patch should be dropped
> from -mm.
> 
> Cheers,
> 	-Matt Helsley
> 


The error is almost certainly because delayacct_tsk_init is being
called at WATCH_TASK_CLONE (which is triggered after the task has been
added to the tasklist) rather than WATCH_INIT (before).

__delayacct_tsk_init, which gets notified by WATCH_TASK_* initializes
the spinlock tsk->delays_lock which could get used as soon as task is
present in tasklist. The lockup is very likely due to use of this
uninitialized spinlock.

So the fix should be to change WATCH_TASK_CLONE to WATCH_TASK_INIT
in the delayacct_watch_task function created by this patch.

--Shailabh



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ