linux-kernel - Re: Building the kernel on an SMP box?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200607301618.k6UGIHEt023129@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:18:17 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Building the kernel on an SMP box?

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:29:17 +0200, Andi Kleen said:
> 
> > That sounds really useful, although I bet it assumes that the build 
> > environment is the same on all machines. Or at least similar. 
> 
> No it doesn't.

What happens with the 'gcc version magic' with modules if the main kernel
and modules are compiled on separate machines with different GCC releases
installed?   Certainly seems like a requirement for a "similar" environment
to me, if compiling with gcc 4.1.0 vs 4.1.1. results in a module that won't
insmod....

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped