[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060729170333.a45efeaf.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:03:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...ts.osdl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...l.org, marcel@...tman.org, fpavlic@...ibm.com,
paulus@...ibm.com, bcollins@...ian.org, tony.luck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [KJ] (re) audit return code handling for kernel_thread [1/3]
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:15:55 -0400
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
> Patch to audit return code checking of kernel_thread. These fixes correct those
> callers who fail to check the return code of kernel_thread at all
>
>
Various people are running around converting open-coded kernel_thread
callers over to the kthread API. Generally that's a good thing, and error
checking should be incorporated at that time.
So there's probably not a lot of point in making these changes now - it'd
be better to work with the various subsystem owners on doing the kthread
conversion.
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/cmm.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,11 @@ cmm_thread(void *dummy)
> static void
> cmm_start_thread(void)
> {
> - kernel_thread(cmm_thread, NULL, 0);
> + if (kernel_thread(cmm_thread, NULL, 0) < 0) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Could not start kernel thread at %s:%d\n",
> + __FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
> + clear_bit(0,&cmm_thread_active);
> + }
> }
This is OK as far as it goes. But really we should propagate any failure
back up to cmm_init() and fail the whole thing, rather than leaving the
driver hanging around in a loaded-but-useless state.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists