[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060730200918.GI31121@lug-owl.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:09:18 +0200
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Nikita Danilov <nikita@...sterfs.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Martin Waitz <tali@...ingilde.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] making the kernel -Wshadow clean - The initial step
On Sun, 2006-07-30 21:24:59 +0200, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> wrote:
> On 30/07/06, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> wrote:
> > Ok, here we go again...
> >
> > This is a series of patches that try to be an initial step towards making
> > the kernel build -Wshadow clean.
> >
> It would be great if maintainers of the various areas that my patches
> touch would explicitly ack or nack patches - preferably giving reasons
> for nack's as well.
My move to a new town is basically done, so I'll give it a run for the
VAX specific bits which I care about.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@...-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: If it doesn't work, force it.
the second : If it breaks, it needed replacing anyway.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists