linux-kernel - Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a8748490607292317t405c906ek8b1577920eeace65@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:17:42 +0200
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Hans Reiser" <reiser@...esys.com>
Cc:	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@....linux.org.uk>, reiserfs-dev@...esys.com,
	reiserfs-list@...esys.com, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: possible recursive locking detected - while running fs operations in loops - 2.6.18-rc2-git5

On 30/07/06, Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com> wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks. That's a nice little test suite.
> >
> Yes, it is quite useful, our developers have added it to the regression
> suite....
>
That's nice.

Now how about that lock validator message I managed to tease out?

Akpm said "... the reiserfs locking appears to be unneeded - this inode
is going down and nobody else can look it up, so what is to be locked
against?" - can you comment on that?


-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/