[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <op.tdhyo9utd4os1z@localhost>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:13:47 +0200
From: Łukasz Mierzwa <prymitive@...erwis.net>
To: "David Masover" <ninja@...phack.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"reiserfs-list@...esys.com" <reiserfs-list@...esys.com>
Subject: Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)
Dnia Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:31:59 +0200, David Masover <ninja@...phack.com>
napisał:
> Nikita Danilov wrote:
>
>> As you see, ext2 code already has multiple file "plugins", with
>> persistent "plugin id" (stored in i_mode field of on-disk struct
>> ext2_inode).
>
> Aha! So here's another question: Is it fair to ask Reiser4 to make its
> plugins generic, or should we be asking ext2/3 first?
>
Doesn't iptables have plugins? Maybe we should make them generic so other
packet filters can use them ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists