[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060731162046.GA4631@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:20:46 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey_y_starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zwane@....linux.org.uk,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, tony@...mide.com, akpm@...l.org,
cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk, len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:08:01AM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> > went ok. I wonder if something changed in acpi recently that caused this
> > change in behaviour ? Len ?
>
> Dave,
>
> I'm no expert but I think it was you that made this change in
> http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;h=567b39bea07e4fbbe091b265b010905e3d30ff5a;hp=1a7bdcef19261deff5a7ea8ee13d5a8ddb434a19;hb=911cb74bb9e77e40749abc2fca6fe74d87d940f3;f=arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>
> + /* Do initialization in ACPI core */
> + acpi_processor_preregister_performance(acpi_perf_data);
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> :-)
I'm puzzled. As that commit message doesn't match the diff.
If you click "commitdiff", you'll see the actual commit for that msg,
which is a one-liner.
Your change in your previous mail makes sense to me though,
so I'll commit it to cpufreq.git later today.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists