[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060731172002.GM31121@lug-owl.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:20:02 +0200
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To: Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@...ons.demon.nl>
Cc: Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>,
Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>,
vonbrand@....utfsm.cl, ipso@...ppymail.ca, reiser@...esys.com,
lkml@...productions.com, jeff@...zik.org, tytso@....edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@...esys.com
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
On Mon, 2006-07-31 18:44:33 +0200, Rudy Zijlstra <rudy@...ons.demon.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-07-31 17:59:58 +0200, Adrian Ulrich
> > <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch> wrote:
> > > A colleague of mine happened to create a ~300gb filesystem and started
> > > to migrate Mailboxes (Maildir-style format = many small files (1-3kb))
> > > to the new LUN. At about 70% the filesystem ran out of inodes; Not a
> >
> > So preparation work wasn't done.
>
> Of course you are right. Preparation work was not fully done. And using
> ext1 would also have been possible. I suspect you are still using ext1,
> cause with proper preparation it is perfectly usable.
Nope, I'm a quite happy ext3 user for quite divergent workloads.
Starting with storing loads of small files in a hugh number of
directories (mkfs -T news) over hugh numbers of files in few
directories (mkfs -O dir_index) to only a small number of really hugh
files (mkfs -T largefile4).
All that I still need to catch up with is 4TB sized files. But I guess
this is really an uncommon workload, but ISTR that somebody even works
on this.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@...-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: Don't believe in miracles: Rely on them!
the second :
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists