[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060731195621.367ed702.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:56:21 +0200
From: Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>
Cc: vonbrand@....utfsm.cl, ipso@...ppymail.ca, reiser@...esys.com,
lkml@...productions.com, jeff@...zik.org, tytso@....edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@...esys.com
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org
regarding reiser4 inclusion
> Well - easy to fix, newfs again with proper inode density (perhaps 1 per
> 2 kB) and redo the migration.
Ehr: Such a migration (on a very busy system) takes *some* time (weeks).
Re-Doing (migrate users back / recreate the FS / start again) the whole
thing isn't really an option..
> Of course you're free to pay for a new
> file system if your fellow admin can't be bothered to remember newfs's
> -i option.
Let's face it: Shit happens and nobody is perfect. A filesystem should
be flexible (modern..) and support Admin/User-needs.
We wouldn't need ECC / Raid / UPS's in a perfect world.
> > Have you ever seen VxFS or WAFL in action?
>
> No I haven't. As long as they are commercial, it's not likely that I
> will.
Why?
NetApp WAFL-Blurb:
http://www.netapp.com/library/tr/3002.pdf
Maybe we should crop the Cc: list .. this is getting OT.
-- Adrian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists