[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060731200718.GA13257@merlin.emma.line.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:07:18 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>
To: Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>
Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@...esys.com
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
Adrian Ulrich schrieb am 2006-07-31:
> Ehr: Such a migration (on a very busy system) takes *some* time (weeks).
> Re-Doing (migrate users back / recreate the FS / start again) the whole
> thing isn't really an option..
All the more important to think about FS requirements *before*
newfs-ing if a quick "one day for rsync/star/dump+restore" isn't
available. If you're hitting, for instance, the hash collision problem
in reiser3, you're as dead as with a FS without inodes.
> > > Have you ever seen VxFS or WAFL in action?
> >
> > No I haven't. As long as they are commercial, it's not likely that I
> > will.
>
> Why?
I'm trying to shift my focus away from computer administration and
better file systems than old-style non-journalling, non-softupdates UFS
are available today and more will follow.
Cc: list weeded out.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists