| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:07:18 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de> To: Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch> Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@...esys.com Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Adrian Ulrich schrieb am 2006-07-31: > Ehr: Such a migration (on a very busy system) takes *some* time (weeks). > Re-Doing (migrate users back / recreate the FS / start again) the whole > thing isn't really an option.. All the more important to think about FS requirements *before* newfs-ing if a quick "one day for rsync/star/dump+restore" isn't available. If you're hitting, for instance, the hash collision problem in reiser3, you're as dead as with a FS without inodes. > > > Have you ever seen VxFS or WAFL in action? > > > > No I haven't. As long as they are commercial, it's not likely that I > > will. > > Why? I'm trying to shift my focus away from computer administration and better file systems than old-style non-journalling, non-softupdates UFS are available today and more will follow. Cc: list weeded out. -- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists