linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060731203829.GF4631@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:38:29 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	bert hubert <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey_y_starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zwane@....linux.org.uk,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, tony@...mide.com, akpm@...l.org,
	cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk, len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on	pentium4

On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 08:57:13PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
 > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:20:46PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > 
 > > Your change in your previous mail makes sense to me though,
 > > so I'll commit it to cpufreq.git later today.
 > 
 > Do you think this will make 2.6.18? Otherwise any kernel with acpi_list
 > compiled in will have no frequency scaling, unless it supports scaling over
 > ACPI.

Yes, I'll queue it for .18

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/