lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060731215933.GB3612@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:59:33 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	nathans@....com, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: XFS vs. swsusp

Hi!

Rafael has patches to add bdev freezing to swsusp. I'd like to know if
they are neccessary (and why).

1) Is sync() enough to guarantee that all the data written before sync
actually reach the platters?

(Or is it that data only reach the journal? OTOH that would be okay, too).

2) If we stop all the user proceses and all the kernel threads, is
that enough to prevent XFS from writing to disk?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ