linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] PCI-Express AER implemetation: Add new defines to pci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1154320698.27051.48.camel@ymzhang-perf.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:38:18 +0800
From:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci maillist <linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
	Tom Long Nguyen <tom.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] PCI-Express AER implemetation: Add new defines to
	pci_regs.h

On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 12:00, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:10:39AM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > Although Greg already accepted the second patch into his testing tree,
> > I still resend it to keep the patch integrity.
> 
> Why?  This is already in 2.6.18-rc3.
I checked 2.6.18-rc3 and it doesn't include the patch of pci_regs.h.

> 
> Please redo the whole series against 2.6.18-rc3, not 2.6.17, otherwise
> it's a pain to forward port...
The patches could be applied to 2.6.18-rc3 cleanly. There is no any
confliction and I tested them under 2.6.18-rc3.

Is it necessary to rebase to 2.6.18-rc3?

Thanks,
Yanmin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/