[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200607310325_MC3-1-C691-D76B@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:22:42 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch] x86_64: fix is_at_popf() for compat tasks
When testing for the REX instruction prefix, first check
for a 32-bit task because in compat mode the REX prefix is an
increment instruction.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
---
Compiled and booted but needs a test case...
--- 2.6.18-rc2-64.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ 2.6.18-rc2-64/arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -141,8 +141,11 @@ static int is_at_popf(struct task_struct
case 0xf0: case 0xf2: case 0xf3:
continue;
- /* REX prefixes */
case 0x40 ... 0x4f:
+ if (is_compat_task())
+ /* register increment */
+ return 0;
+ /* REX prefix */
continue;
/* CHECKME: f0, f2, f3 */
--
Chuck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists