[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44CEBD77.2060502@namesys.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:33:27 -0600
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@....de>
CC: Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@...nkenlights.ch>, vonbrand@....utfsm.cl,
ipso@...ppymail.ca, lkml@...productions.com, jeff@...zik.org,
tytso@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
reiserfs-list@...esys.com
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org
regarding reiser4 inclusion
Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>>Have you ever seen VxFS or WAFL in action?
>>
>>
>
>No I haven't. As long as they are commercial, it's not likely that I
>will.
>
>
WAFL was well done. It has several innovations that I admire,
including quota trees, non-support of fragments for performance reasons,
and the basic WAFL notion applied to an NFS RAID special (though
important) case.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists