[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44CF26FB.2000007@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:03:16 +0159
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>,
'Heiko Carstens' <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Martin Schwidefsky' <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: do { } while (0) question
Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:45:53AM +0159, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 02:03 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
>>>>> #if KILLER == 1
>>>>> #define MACRO
>>>>> #else
>>>>> #define MACRO do { } while (0)
>>>>> #endif
>>>>>
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (some_condition)
>>>>> MACRO
>>>>>
>>>>> if_this_is_not_called_you_loose_your_data();
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you want to define KILLER, 0 or 1? I personally choose 0.
>>>> Really? Does it compile?
>>> No, and that is the whole point.
>>>
>>> The empty 'do {} while (0)' makes the missing semicolon a syntax error.
>> Bulls^WNope, it was a bad example (we don't want to break the compilation,
>> just not want to emit a warn or an err).
>
> Your sentence does not make sense, but I'm going to take it as saying
> that you disagree that the above will cause a syntax error. Try it:
No, my code is bad, not his thoughts.
regards,
--
<a href="http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/">Jiri Slaby</a>
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists