linux-kernel - synchronous signal in the blocked signal context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060731191449.B4592@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:14:49 -0700
From:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	paulmck@...ibm.com, torvalds@...l.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: synchronous signal in the blocked signal context

This patch (b0423a0d9cc836b2c3d796623cd19236bfedfe63)

[PATCH] Remove duplicate code in signal.c

reverts a patch introduced by Linus long time back.

http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/gnupatch@...621871mAhWfFZzuA74eKKLvE6OQ

Was this intentional?

With the current mainline code, SIGSEGV inside a SIGSEGV handler will endup
in linux handling endless recursive faults.

Just wondering if this has been discussed before and is intentional.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/